From SME to C
When I worked for World Vision I had an easy means of checking up on people I worked with. I don't remember just how I did it, but with a few clicks I'd be at a list of 'logged-on users' - this was especially helpful when determining whether someone was out of the office or simply ignoring your calls and emails.
The only snag being that password sharing was rampant which from time-to-time resulted in the users name appearing when they weren't actually present.
Checking this list was always my first course of action when hunting down the 'signer' for this, or 'owner' for that. Following that I'd make my way up the stairs, down the stairs--on the hunt before the target vacated their chair. Meandering the building was easy with only four floors.
Despite the fact that many, if not all, of my embarrasing career moments occured at World Vision--mostly due to being 17 at the point of hire making me unskilled for this, naive about that--I miss the feeling of familiarity. Over the near 5 years of working there I truly began to feel like I was a part of it. Every corner was my turf, every name familiar to me and everyone knew me.
Having gone from the non-profit world, to the for profit and private, to for-profit and public I've found the biggest change to be joining the likes of the publicly owned entities. However, ownership aside, it may be in fact the size that has made the biggest impact and not whether the company has a ticker symbol.
You get the sense here, at Company X, that regardless of whether I am here for 3 years or 13 I will never know the in's and out's of all it's moving parts like I did at World Vision, or like I could have at Russell Investment Group. This I find a bit daunting as I am all about redundancy, routine--not to say I don't like to innovate, but I pretty much don't veer outside innovating my routine--if that makes sense. I like to fix and improve what already exists, not create what doesn't when it come to my profession.
Though this may be because truly I think everything has already been done, been said and therefore can any of us really do anything better than to 'say that more clearly' or 'create this more effectively' or 'tend to that more passionately' this may be reality, it has all been done before.
There are perks to being a part of bigger group, like numerous open jobs and bigger bonuses but at the end of the day the exit of anyone other than the President might cause little more than a ripple.
I don't intend to convey that life in big companies for sure leaves more to be desired, actually at this stage in life I'll take the handful of always open doors and healthy bonus check over knowing the names of 98% of everyone on payroll--but that may not always be the case.
The only snag being that password sharing was rampant which from time-to-time resulted in the users name appearing when they weren't actually present.
Checking this list was always my first course of action when hunting down the 'signer' for this, or 'owner' for that. Following that I'd make my way up the stairs, down the stairs--on the hunt before the target vacated their chair. Meandering the building was easy with only four floors.
Despite the fact that many, if not all, of my embarrasing career moments occured at World Vision--mostly due to being 17 at the point of hire making me unskilled for this, naive about that--I miss the feeling of familiarity. Over the near 5 years of working there I truly began to feel like I was a part of it. Every corner was my turf, every name familiar to me and everyone knew me.
Having gone from the non-profit world, to the for profit and private, to for-profit and public I've found the biggest change to be joining the likes of the publicly owned entities. However, ownership aside, it may be in fact the size that has made the biggest impact and not whether the company has a ticker symbol.
You get the sense here, at Company X, that regardless of whether I am here for 3 years or 13 I will never know the in's and out's of all it's moving parts like I did at World Vision, or like I could have at Russell Investment Group. This I find a bit daunting as I am all about redundancy, routine--not to say I don't like to innovate, but I pretty much don't veer outside innovating my routine--if that makes sense. I like to fix and improve what already exists, not create what doesn't when it come to my profession.
Though this may be because truly I think everything has already been done, been said and therefore can any of us really do anything better than to 'say that more clearly' or 'create this more effectively' or 'tend to that more passionately' this may be reality, it has all been done before.
There are perks to being a part of bigger group, like numerous open jobs and bigger bonuses but at the end of the day the exit of anyone other than the President might cause little more than a ripple.
I don't intend to convey that life in big companies for sure leaves more to be desired, actually at this stage in life I'll take the handful of always open doors and healthy bonus check over knowing the names of 98% of everyone on payroll--but that may not always be the case.
